|
|
Post by theboss1 on Feb 9, 2011 18:34:01 GMT -5
Mariners Send:
Matt Garza $2.25M (6)
Dodgers 2nd rounder 2011
Red Sox 2nd rounder 2011
Phillies Send:
Russel Martin $1M (5)
Angel Pagan $3M (6)
I do this because i get a solid catcher at Martin replacing Bengie molina who might retire and i get a very good OF. Giving up Garza doesnt hurt.
|
|
|
|
Post by twinwitzd on Feb 9, 2011 18:35:30 GMT -5
accpet cuz i like garza this year...not sure bout pagan considering the beltran situation...also the 2nd rounders will land me some young talent
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Feb 9, 2011 18:39:46 GMT -5
veto, garza will do well in the NL and those picks could have value. although martin wwill start at C he hasnt prven nothin in the last few yrs aside from one aall star year. as for pagan people dont know his situatuin. to add it on, phillies is the one who takes less $$$$$
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 9, 2011 18:41:54 GMT -5
Veto.
|
|
|
|
Post by twinwitzd on Feb 9, 2011 18:44:44 GMT -5
y?  explain y u veto if u do |
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Feb 9, 2011 18:47:42 GMT -5
Veto. 2nd round picks are valuable and could turn into blue chip prospects. Garza is a top 20 pitcher potentially, and Pagan and Martin don't really reach Garza's value in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by twinwitzd on Feb 9, 2011 18:50:20 GMT -5
ok at least u explained y..if some1 else did this trade i wud probly veto also...i understand..
|
|
|
|
Post by cmill78 on Feb 9, 2011 18:53:58 GMT -5
Veto
And only, really because of the draft picks. Pagan will play (and steal some bags) just not sure if it is in CF or RF. Martin is a decent catcher even when he isn't 100%. He had that all-star year so early in his career that people assumed he was going to be that good forever. Catcher is athin position. But adding those draft picks killed this for me. Garza stands well on his own.
|
|
explain y u veto if u do