|
Post by redsoxgm (forbz) on Apr 23, 2011 10:41:08 GMT -5
I think we should make White Sox to make an LM, he is far more active than all teams and it will defiinitly benefit this league
|
|
|
Post by cmill78 on Apr 23, 2011 10:47:39 GMT -5
I could see if Chicago and Minnesota weren't active, but they are. The reason that it seems they aren't is because now that the season has started I believe they are paying attention to the ESPN site as this site was supposed to be for the off-season and minor league transactions during the season.
I would say you would need more than a majority vote from the entire league for one of them to be replaced. Just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxgm (forbz) on Apr 23, 2011 10:57:35 GMT -5
im not saying replace them, just add another or least allow him to bring in new owners, because alot of teams arent active
|
|
|
Post by cmill78 on Apr 23, 2011 11:00:38 GMT -5
I have no problem with White Sox being more involved. As long as the two LM's approve, I think it would help a lot.
|
|
|
Post by O's on Apr 24, 2011 17:24:02 GMT -5
See my problem is the NEW owners need to be invited to the ESPN sites and then the trades that have been approved need to be put through on ESPN!! I'm just sayin!! So I understand that they are paying attention to the ESPN sites, but with trades being put on here and then voted on here means they need to pay attention to this too!!
So with all that said I think multiple LM's is a great idea...If one LM can't make it on for a week..then what do we do..oh wait we have a 2nd LM for the AL/NL that can take care of it! I think it only makes sense to have 2-3 owners that are LM's to process trades..etc....just sayin
|
|
|
Post by Nick(Cubs) on Apr 24, 2011 20:34:54 GMT -5
I would be fine with giving White Sox LM powers.
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Apr 25, 2011 16:00:27 GMT -5
And I would be happy to be an LM
|
|
|
Post by cmill78 on Apr 26, 2011 10:25:01 GMT -5
Okay, I will PM Twins and let him know to add White Sox as a LM on the ESPN site.
|
|