|
|
Post by redsoxgm (forbz) on Jan 25, 2011 21:34:52 GMT -5
Red Sox Trade
Roy Halladay $20 2013+
John Lackey $$15.25 2014+
Mark Reynolds $1.8(5)
Tigers Trade
Max Sherzer $1.35
Rick Porcello $1
Shane Victorino $1.5
|
|
|
|
Post by TigerzGM on Jan 25, 2011 21:36:20 GMT -5
I accept. Got an amazing 1-2 SP punch now with Verlander/Halladay and I think Lackey and Reynolds can both rebound
|
|
|
|
Post by redsoxgm (forbz) on Jan 25, 2011 21:36:35 GMT -5
i did this trade utimately to shed salary this puts my team under the cap. Also i got very good young talented pitchers to go along with the freak and cain giving me one of the best young rotations in the league. victorino for reynolds is pretty close, i feel like i need a CF more the 3B at this point
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick(Cubs) on Jan 25, 2011 21:37:46 GMT -5
I approve this trade. Tigers clearly gets the better side talent wise but redsox saves close to $35M. all this while getting 2 young SP and a great OF.
|
|
|
|
Post by holaadios123 on Jan 25, 2011 21:38:05 GMT -5
veto!! this is ridiculous
|
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Jan 25, 2011 21:38:24 GMT -5
Veto, I know the Red Sox is dumping cap space but Halladay is the NL Cy Young, Lackey is an ok pitcher (even though he is expensive) Reynolds is one of the best power hitters in the MLB. Scherzer is a good #2-middle of the rotation caliber pitcher (in my eyes), Porcello has potential and Victorino is a solid OF. I don't feel that the talents match up
|
|
|
|
Post by cmill78 on Jan 25, 2011 21:39:09 GMT -5
This trade is better than it actually looks though the Tigers make out better right now. And other than the Tigers now being above the salary cap this trade is decent.
Scherzer will be a stud, Reynolds will hit 30+ homers, Lackey is on his way down. Vicotrino is a 3 category player so he makes up for the loss of Reynolds.
Approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 25, 2011 21:40:01 GMT -5
1. Dbacks can't vote.
2. I approve. Lackey isn't great anymore. BoSox dump a ton of salary. It really doesn't look fair but with my thinking Halladay has one, maybe two more really good years. Yes, the Halladay era is coming to a close.
|
|
|
|
Post by redsoxgm (forbz) on Jan 25, 2011 21:41:06 GMT -5
i dont see how in any way how this trade could be vetoed? if im losing two huge contracts my team is a good 15mill over the cap and porcello and sherzer both have shown flashes that they can be great
|
|
|
|
Post by TigerzGM on Jan 25, 2011 21:41:51 GMT -5
I'm gonna try to win now and this trade ultimately helps me do that. I'm going to look to deal Rollins and Lackey to shed cap again after this.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 25, 2011 21:46:12 GMT -5
Trade stands now at 3-1 in favor of approval.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Jan 25, 2011 23:08:27 GMT -5
It's borderline, but I'm going to approve. Even though Red Sox loses one of the best pitchers of the decade, Halladay is 33 and very expensive. That 35M could go to capturing a major piece in FA, which ultimately evens out this trade. He also comes away with a couple great young pitchers who will improve while Lackey and Halladay decline.
|
|
|
|
Post by theboss1 on Jan 26, 2011 6:47:30 GMT -5
Veto, this trade needs to be reworked! What are you thinking red sox!
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Jan 26, 2011 9:02:03 GMT -5
dbacks can vote wsox, so it 3-3 with me for the final decision. APPORVE. I do not see how this is unfair in any way. Sox sheds contracts, but tigers gets value
DBACKS is on the TC indians quite the TC
|
|
|
|
Post by theboss1 on Jan 26, 2011 10:51:15 GMT -5
dbacks is #9 on the committee
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 26, 2011 16:35:00 GMT -5
Sorry I didn't know D-backs could vote. I could defenitely see why the deal would be vetoed and I was on the fence with this one. However, the deal goes through.
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Jan 26, 2011 20:45:16 GMT -5
yes approved
|
|
