|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 12:26:31 GMT -5
Pirates agree to trade Colton Cain (prospect) and their 2011 4th rd. pick to the Cardinals for Allen Craig (prospect)
|
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Jan 29, 2011 12:28:20 GMT -5
Veto, although it's a small trade, Craig is already at the MLB level and Colton Cain had a 5.03 ERA in college
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 29, 2011 12:30:44 GMT -5
Veto. You'll have to wait years for Cain to develop and from what i looked at, Craig is much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick(Cubs) on Jan 29, 2011 12:32:29 GMT -5
Veto
|
|
|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 12:34:31 GMT -5
Perhaps the most ridiculous veto I've seen yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 29, 2011 12:36:50 GMT -5
Trade still isn't vetoed.
|
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Jan 29, 2011 12:37:56 GMT -5
why because just because some players most people don't know of ur trying to rip them off for, and as you said yourself on the last trade of mine you vetoed I'm just trying to do my job on the TC, so you have to respect our vote
|
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Jan 29, 2011 12:38:25 GMT -5
Approve. Craig is an "old" rookie and only batted .246 last year. Cain is only 19 and could develop into a strong pitcher.
|
|
|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 12:39:22 GMT -5
Trade still isn't vetoed. I know, I'm still just trying to figure out what goes on in a persons head that makes them veto something like this. |
|
|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 12:40:57 GMT -5
why because just because some players most people don't know of ur trying to rip them off for, and as you said yourself on the last trade of mine you vetoed I'm just trying to do my job on the TC, so you have to respect our vote And the truth comes out, I thought that had something to do with it. |
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 29, 2011 12:41:29 GMT -5
Well since I had never heard of those guys I did some investigating. Cain isn't that good and you're getting the pick. Craig is already in the MLB. Just because it's small doesn't mean it's fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Jan 29, 2011 12:41:50 GMT -5
well since you always look up things to uphold my trades I decided two can play that game and I realized Craig is already at the MLB level and Cain had a 5.03 ERA in college and hurt his back which is another downside.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Jan 29, 2011 12:43:34 GMT -5
Except that Craig won't even have a starting job for a couple years.
|
|
|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 12:43:46 GMT -5
well since you always look up things to uphold my trades I decided two can play that game and I realized Craig is already at the MLB level and Cain had a 5.03 ERA in college and hurt his back which is another downside. He had a 5.03 ERA in 34 innings. Struck out 32 and had a 1.09 WHIP. Craig is a 4th OF at best. |
|
|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 12:44:24 GMT -5
Well since I had never heard of those guys I did some investigating. Cain isn't that good and you're getting the pick. Craig is already in the MLB. Just because it's small doesn't mean it's fair. You didn't even take the time to read and comprehend the deal. |
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Jan 29, 2011 12:44:35 GMT -5
Except that Craig won't even have a starting job for a couple years. Cain will probably still be in AA ball. |
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Jan 29, 2011 12:44:30 GMT -5
ok but he's already progressed to the MLB level you have your vote and I have mine
|
|
|
|
Post by pirates on Jan 29, 2011 13:03:15 GMT -5
You guys say you researched the deal but you voted veto 2 and 4 minutes after the deal was posted.
|
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Jan 29, 2011 13:07:57 GMT -5
it doesnt take me over 5 minutes to search 2 names and look at stats
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Jan 29, 2011 13:49:04 GMT -5
VETO
|
|
