|
|
Post by cardinals on Feb 4, 2011 21:35:08 GMT -5
Brewers get: Colby Rasmus CF
Cardinals get: Carlos Gomez Cf and Mil 2nd Round Pick 2011
Cardinals wanted a more certain starting Cf and another pick
|
|
|
|
Post by justin on Feb 4, 2011 21:35:33 GMT -5
i accept
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 4, 2011 21:36:22 GMT -5
Approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick(Cubs) on Feb 4, 2011 21:36:57 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by MetsGM (Owen) on Feb 4, 2011 21:38:22 GMT -5
Veto. Personally I feel Rasmus is only going to get better, Gomez only gets SB he hit .247 last season w/5 HR 24 RBI I think Rasmus will develop into a "heart of the order" caliber hitter in the next three years, Veto sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Feb 4, 2011 21:38:56 GMT -5
A little bit odd, since Rasmus seems to be on the rise and a possible top player down the road, but if that's what Cards thinks is best for his team, then fine. Approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by theboss1 on Feb 4, 2011 21:42:20 GMT -5
veto
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 4, 2011 21:42:28 GMT -5
I know from past trades that Cards likes picks. It's still an approval for me, but yes, Rasmus is defenitely the better player.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 4, 2011 21:43:37 GMT -5
|
|
reds
New Member
Posts: 578
|
Post by reds on Feb 4, 2011 21:45:21 GMT -5
this is bull shit, we need new trade commitiee members, trades like this should not get vetoed.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 4, 2011 21:46:49 GMT -5
What's BS is people complaining after every veto.
|
|
reds
New Member
Posts: 578
|
Post by reds on Feb 4, 2011 21:49:02 GMT -5
this should not be a veto, let the owners manage their team jesus christ
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Feb 4, 2011 21:51:23 GMT -5
omg myteam got a deal vetoed at least i dont cry about it evrey time. approve why not.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 4, 2011 21:51:28 GMT -5
Well, let me ask you, what's a veto to you? I'm not being threatening or mean, I just want to see what you say.
|
|
reds
New Member
Posts: 578
|
Post by reds on Feb 4, 2011 21:55:11 GMT -5
in my thoughts a veto should be a trade that is 100% dreadful, a trade that could destroy a franshise.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteSoxGM (Michael) on Feb 4, 2011 21:56:53 GMT -5
So a veto is a trade that a person does when their account is hacked? Everybody is smart enough to make decent trades. This isn't decent.
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Feb 4, 2011 21:58:25 GMT -5
bossd!
|
|
|
|
Post by cmill78 on Feb 4, 2011 22:02:59 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
